Insights
Perspectives on continuous cybersecurity program management, budget strategy, and measurable risk reduction.
ATT&CK v20 expands coverage of AI-enabled attacks, identity threats and critical infrastructure. For security leaders, the real question is whether those changes expose gaps in their programs, and what to do about them.
Acuity Core and Acuity Essentials are running with customers in the public and private sector, and the conversations we're having with CISOs and MSSPs keep landing on the same problems. Here's what we're hearing and what's new.
A cybersecurity maturity assessment should tell you where your program stands, which gaps matter against real threats, and what to fix next. Here's how to run one with NIST CSF 2.0.
Acuity Essentials now takes an MSSP from a client's documents to evidence-checked maturity scores, threat coverage, gaps and a roadmap, across every client from one platform.
No program has ever matured because someone scored it. Maturity levels describe the work a program can reliably execute — which means the only way up is through execution.
Most security budgets are defended with activity metrics. Maturity grows through execution — and budget conversations change once you can show the work that moved it.
Boards do not want technique IDs. They want to know which attacks you can withstand, what the next dollar buys, and how you will prove coverage actually improved.
Tool sprawl is usually a process and ownership problem wearing a technology costume. A look at how the PPT triad reframes budget and roadmap decisions.